Analyzing arguments
Item
1:
“Stop
wasting my time in this store! Either decide you can afford the stereo, or go
without music in your room”
Structure:
Premise 1: Either decide you can afford the stereo,
or go without music in your room
Premise 2: You don’t want buy the stereo.
Conclusion: so go without music in your room
à
Error: not all the options are covered in premise 1
Analysis:
Type of fallacy: false dilemma
This statement is false because there are not only
two choices besides just buying the expensive stereo and going without music.
There are many other options, for example, you could buy a cheaper stereo or you
could borrow a stereo from your friends or someone else and have music in your
room without making a purchase. There are many options beside ‘either decide you
can afford the stereo, or go without music in your room’ in the argument.
Item
2:
Analysis:
Type of fallacy: fallacy
of relevance – appeal to authority
This picture shows that
Taylor Swift (a famous singer) is used to affirm a milk product while she is not really experts in that field. She is promoting milk.
The poster writes “Some studies suggest that teens who choose milk instead of
sugary drinks tend to be leaner, and the protein helps build muscle”. Without
facts and data she has no authority to endorse milk like a nutritionist.
Item
3:
“My roommate said her philosophy class was hard, and the
one I’m in is hard, too. All philosophy classes must be hard!”
Structure:
Premise 1: My roommate said her philosophy class
was hard.
Premise 2: Another roommate said her philosophy
class is hard, too.
Conclusion: All philosophy classes
must be hard.

Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét